Journeys End

• deleted accounts: 449 (13.98%)
• accounts with 1 tweet: 21 (0.65%)
• accounts with 2 tweets: 32 (1.00%)
• other accounts: 2706 (84.27%)
• total: 3211

There is a discrepancy of 3, from users BenFreemann, ovan10, and YannickBraun. 

Now for @ivetesangalo:

• deleted accounts: 431 (9.07%)
• accounts with 1 tweet: 30 (0.63%)
• accounts with 2 tweet: 92 (1.94%)
• other accounts: 4190 (88.21%)
• total: 4750

There is a discrepancy of 7 from andreiaAMO, Brubruna, buguinhaBrito, Erica_nasciment, julianestephany, KEKELZITA, and pedro_PERWAH.

Labels: internet

// posted by steve @ 11:15 AM 0 Comments Links to this post

• deleted accounts: 348 (12.07%)
• accounts with 1 tweet: 407 (14.11%)
• accounts with 2 tweets: 288 (9.98%)
• other accounts: 1838 (63.71%)
• total: 2885

• deleted accounts: 113 (6.50%)
• accounts with 1 tweet: 41 (2.35%)
• accounts with 2 tweets: 47 (2.70%)
• other accounts: 1542 (88.42%)
• total: 1744

Labels: internet

// posted by steve @ 11:20 PM 1 Comments Links to this post

Given that we can have purely numeric domains, i.e. 131500.info, why not have domains that map to our mobile phone numbers for personal use?

What's the point? For one, you can give out your public mobile number instead of your website, since it is much easier to communicate numbers than domain names. This can be used to communicate other information that is difficult to convey by voice, e.g. emails, skype names, etc. A simple website at $your_mobile.mob would overcome all these.

This obviously has privacy implications, and as such should be entirely opt-in.

Any such system would need to be regulated, ideally controlled by carriers. A custom TLD like .mob would probably be a good idea too. One must also keep in mind however that such easily predictable domain names will be targeted by spammers.

Labels: internet

// posted by steve @ 3:20 PM 1 Comments Links to this post

You came to me during my first year in university, and sold yourself as the paragon of virtue and integrity - the kind organisation I would be foolish not to be associated with if I want to get anywhere in Australia doing software, or "Information Technology" as they call it now days.

I didn't join then, because I didn't have the money. I didn't join later because my career focus shifted away from software. I won't join now ever, because you have sold out.

I am referring to the honorary membership you awarded to none other than one Stephen Conroy, Internet Villain of the Year, 2009.

You had such nice things to say about him too:

“We are very pleased to honour Senator Conroy’s contribution and support of the significance of ICT to the economy and the key role of ICT professionals in Australia’s future,” said Mr Wells.

If I am so inclined as to read between the lines, I can't help but get the feeling you are thanking Mr. Conroy for pushing the Internet filter scheme, and in the process provided jobs for the programmers and technicians involved in the various trials and consultations.

“Senator Conroy has always encouraged the ACS in its role as the independent voice of the ICT profession, welcoming our input to various enquiries and working groups, and regularly attending key ACS events. We are grateful for his on-going support,” Mr Wells said.

I don't think Mr. Conroy is listening to your input, or learning from your events - he continues to believe filtering the Internet is doable, and not a waste of time and resources.

I reject you, Australia Computer Society, as "voice of the ICT profession". Your actions are deplorable and shows a lack of integrity. If I was a member, I would be ashamed.

Cheers,
Steve

Labels: australia, censorship, computer, internet, IRL, politics

// posted by steve @ 8:00 PM 2 Comments Links to this post

Edit: it occurred to me what I have below is the basics of a thin facebook api wrapper. I might make it into one at some point in the future.

If you don't know what this does, you don't need it. Hope this helps some one. Written because pyfacebook is broken, always returns error 100.

FB_API_HOST="api.facebook.com"
FB_API_PATH="/restserver.php"

def get_session(auth_token):
        params={
                "api_key":FB_API_KEY,
                "v":"1.0",
                "auth_token":auth_token,
                "generate_session_secret":1,
                "method":"auth.getSession",
        }

        sorted = params.items()
        sorted.sort(key=lambda x:x[0])

        str_to_hash = ''.join(["%s=%s"%(x[0], x[1]) for x in sorted])
        str_to_hash += FB_API_SECRET

        md5 = hashlib.md5()
        md5.update(str_to_hash)

        sig = md5.hexdigest()

        params["sig"] = sig

        encoded_params = urllib.urlencode(params)
        headers = {
                "Content-type":"application/x-www-form-urlencoded",
        }

        conn = httplib.HTTPConnection(FB_API_HOST)
        conn.request("POST", FB_API_PATH, encoded_params, headers)

        response = conn.getresponse()

        print response.status, response.reason
        return response.read()

This Works For Me when I use it with iphone facebook-connect client:

[FBSession sessionForApplication:myApiKey getSessionProxy:myURL delegate:self];

Cheers,
Steve

Labels: code, internet, software

// posted by steve @ 4:03 PM 3 Comments Links to this post

You can’t be serious.

You wants to filter all Internet connections now, without the option of opting out?! You want every Australian to be on a list so you can see who is “naughty” and who isn’t?!

You can’t be serious.

You wants to filter all illegal material on the Internet?!

You can’t be serious.

How on earth do you propose to classify the contents of more than 181,000,000 websites (Sept. 2008, Netcraft)!? Assuming a government worker can classify a site as illegal or legal in 1 minute, that person will have to work non-stop every day for 344 years to classify 181,000,000 websites.

You can’t be serious.

How on earth do you propose to even filter that many sites without rendering the Internet useless?!  

You can’t be serious.

How can we be sure the site blocked really is illegal, when we can’t access it!? How do you stop the system from abused? How do you correct the system’s mistakes? Why isn’t any of these described in detail?!

You can’t be serious.

How on earth are you planning on preventing people from circumventing your flitters using encryption?!

You can’t be serious.

Get a fucking clue Steve Conroy. The Internet doesn’t work like that. You have a background in the broadcast industry, and the Internet is nothing like it. You should leave technical decisions to people who know what they are talking about and stop pissing off every Internet literate Australian.

DIAF,
Steve

Labels: australia, censorship, computer, internet, IRL, politics, rant

// posted by steve @ 7:45 PM

It seems a competent telecommunications minister is hard to come by in Australia. Our new telecommunications minister, Senator Conroy,recently demonstrated that he does not understand a) the Internet; b) freedom of speech; c) the concept of the slippery slope.

Firstly, Senator Conroy’s lack of understanding of the Internet:

Senator Conroy says it will be mandatory for all internet service providers to provide clean feeds, or ISP filtering, to houses and schools that are free of pornography and inappropriate material. - ABC news, 31/12/2007

I would like Senator Conroy to explain how exactly ISPs are going do the above for sites which feature mixed content, such as many forums and discussion boards, youtube, and many other sites where content is primarily generated by users. If a discussion board is white-listed, what happens when inappropriate content is posted by a rouge party? There is no technically feasible way to block content on a per-page basis because of encryption and the difficulty automatically classifying content. For example, how can software tell the difference human anatomy and pornography? Further, the Internet is not just websites. There are non-http traffic such as IRC, bittorrent, newsnet, p2p, MSN, jabber, etc. How are ISPs expected to policy those?

Secondly, freedom of speech, a concept which the Senator does not appear to comprehend:

"If people equate freedom of speech with watching child pornography, then the Rudd-Labor Government is going to disagree." - Senator Conroy

Here Senator Conroy equates freedom of speech with watching child pornography, then declares that since child pornography is evil, freedom of speech must also evil. This technique is called a Strawman Argument. It is at best a misleading way of arguing a point. Freedom of speech in no way justifies nor sanctions the creation or distribution of child pornography. Freedom of speech is not a free ticket to anarchy. I would have imagined a Senator would know this. In addition, Internet filtering you can opt-out of can not combat child pornography. Those who are going to look at child pornography are either going to a) subvert the system; or b) opt-out of it. Despite the fact Senator Conroy is using child pornography as a justification for censoring the Internet, it will do nothing whatsoever to curtail child pornography.

Finally we come to the slippery slope which Senator Conroy is happy to slide down:

"Labor makes no apologies to those that argue that any regulation of the internet is like going down the Chinese road," - Senator Conroy

If Labor is making no apologies for going down the Chinese road with regards to Internet filtering, what else is Labor not going to make apologies for? Will Labor also make no apologies to those who argue that governments which do not listen to their civil liberty groups’ concerns is heading down the despot road?

The Senator is, despite his failings, a politician. He is not without his tricks. He seeks to placate those of us concerned with our civil liberties both now and in the future by allowing us to opt-out. Except opting-out means our names end up on a list somewhere, a list some people will interpret as a list of naughty-people who look at naughty-things. Further, it creates a state of affairs where the average citizen only has access to parts of the Internet allowed by the Government. In North Korea a similar state of affairs exists, bought on by decades of suppressing free press and communication. It has led to the citizen of North Korea to regard their oppressed and dreary lives in a third world country the height of human civilisation, a paradise on Earth. Are citizens of Australia so trusting of the government that we will accepted censorship without seeing what is being censored first?

All in all, Senator Conroy is Yet Another Incompetent Telecommunications Minister. I wish that just for once the Telecommunications Minister has a degree in engineering. Then perhaps he or she will understand the futility of attempting to censor the Internet.

Labels: australia, censorship, internet, IRL, politics, privacy, rant

// posted by steve @ 1:32 AM